nebulous

WeakenedHen5
WeakenedHen5
Nah but they’ve literally played more WW3RP than me no one is trying to change it back lmao and they don’t need your opinion on their “low effort applications” when they’ve literally been some of the original guys who shaped the older server and that
WeakenedHen5
WeakenedHen5
All the guys you rated disagree and basically disrespected over their effort have been in this community far longer than you have and have contributed a lot no need to be calling them out publicly
spitfire
spitfire
wowie man
Diretide
Diretide
meanwhile if you check the timestamps she didn't even bother to read them. took her 2 minutes to give 4 disagrees lol, pretty low effort if you ask me
Laura
Laura
Yes- because that is totally what we are doing. Big brain. How dare I rate disagree on a low-effort application for a brand new faction thats trying to revive Stasiland. You make it sound like I'm making a huge thread post about this. But like, you came here to comment on me just- literally disagreeing on the effort of the applications.
Laura
Laura
I'm sorry I want to give feedback. Didn't know being in a community for a long time gives a magical shield. Also.. 'they’ve literally been some of the original guys who shaped the older server and that'. Yes.. because the older server was so much better and should be what we strive for.
D
Deleted member 305
your feedback was that they were 'low effort' though
Laura
Laura
Laura
Laura
Applications aren't exactly meant to be commented on to give feedback. Isn't my place. I use the ratings for that.
WeakenedHen5
WeakenedHen5
You aren’t really in a position to give feedback gamer you can leave your ratings and that yeah but to call someone’s character application “low effort” when I’ve read them and they clearly aren’t is downright disrespectful to guys who busted their asses for this community

To be honest, if no one asks, don’t bother answering
D
Deleted member 305
in all seriousness, if you want to give me feedback on anything just drop me a convo or a steam message, I can't feel the vibe in this conversation anymore and I think it's going to derail into something no one wants so I'll just go eat my pita in peace now
Laura
Laura
Laura
Laura
To be honest, that's your opinion @WeakenedHen5. Have a nice evening.
WeakenedHen5
WeakenedHen5
Understandable, have a nice day
Sneaky
Sneaky
I think that judging a person's ability/competence simply from the effort put in their applications is a rather slippery slope. While sure, there certainly is a correlation between the quality of an application and the competence of a person, it's exactly that - a correlation. I've seen many times where someone writes an application longer than the entirety of the bible, yet turn out to be quite a bad staff member.
Sneaky
Sneaky
I've always believed that when judging applications, former experience and competence should always go before the quality of the application. Of course, it shouldn't count as a free ticket for a position simply because you've held the position before, but it certainly shouldn't be disregarded in favor of who decided to put in the most unnecessary information.
Dr Heckyll
Dr Heckyll
@Laura just fuming cause your """high-effort""" vampire romance novel didn't win the Man Booker, pack it in mate
Laura
Laura
I see your side of the argument Sneaky and thank you for writing it out. Yea, I kinda agree, but at the same time, I disagree at some points. I think it's all about a balance between the two.
chronos
chronos
fuming because freddoes went up 5p
D
Deleted member 305
i miss greggs