The only hope I have is that the Abrams has way better mobility, also perhaps the M833 round that may be added since they actually have it ready but not released yet, it's sort of on standby as a means of balance I assume if it's needed during the actual Live Server update.
They better buff the fuck out of the Challanger 1 and Abrams, the Challanger 1 has better armour then the Abrams and Chobham armour wasn't a special type of armour they only placed on certian parts of the tank, it was used on the whole part of the tank, what the fuck is Gaijin pulling with this shit? Not to mention the depleted Uranium rounds that the tanks used. Why don't we have them? Why do the Russian tanks get buffed and Challanger 1 gets slight armour improvements despite the armour being practically double the effectiveness of the T-64B's armour? The Challanger 2 can compete with T-14 Armata's but the Challanger 1 keels over like a wounded puppy to a tank that was designed in the 1960's and released in the 1980's.
Well, they did add 2 types of Shells for the Challenger on this revision of the Dev Server, L15A5 and L23A1, not sure if they are good or not, buffed the reload speed to 9 rounds per minute and they corrected the gear ratio too. You can read up on some stuff here: https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/401498-update-177-advancing-storm-preliminary-notes/
>The armour detail on M1, Challenger, Leopard2K and the T-64B has been improved.
if the la-200 is below the mig-17 in BR im uninstallingi think russian bias just got worse
https://warthunder.com/en/news/5319-development-la-200-the-high-speed-kite-en
two klimov VK-1 engines and three 37mms
the US also got the F84G now :/
@Husky
la-200:
I've played several games since the launch. Gaijin is taking the piss.
