nebulous

That being said, the one extra unit in this case wouldn't have much made a difference, would it? If they were all guarding you they'd have probably fucked off to deal with the 647-E anyway and if the other wasn't there, probs would have been called as backup.

The rules are set in stone though? You literally can't relate to anyone else's PK appeal especially Losefa's because of the fact that your situation is different. I don't think you seem to get this.

Let me respond in plain English.

There was meant to be a Five Cop minimum, but since Citizen-on-Citizen kills don't happen often, never changed because it was a low-priority issue.

But I died, being non-cop citizen, by an Assassin, by FOUR cops on at the time, when at the time it was supposed to be FIVE but was instead written down as THREE.

So, I'm only aiming on getting exception to the rule as it should've been changed accordingly. That's it.

don't patronize my man rabid bro, he's not taking any sides here

Genuine question; where all four cops on at the time guarding your speech?

Oh, not patronizing him, just saying clearly enough so everyone hears it clearly.

By the way, there were two cops actually guarding the speech/questionnaire, but they ditched me and I got shot 15 seconds later.

But still, it was four cops at the time that were logged on and tagged/flagged on. And when I heard that the rules were meant to likely be changed (and later from what I know, confirmed), that's when I made the appeals.

Wash you were told specifically by @alex that if the rule was supposed to be changed then BQ would've done it when he changed the shotcop rule. I don't understand why you don't understand this? Just let it go man.

Presuming the other two weren't nearby, they likely got called to help with whatever the two rushed off to do, because they didn't respond to you getting domed. If that extra unit was on, I doubt they'd have randomly decided to stick with you either.

Again I understand that there should have been five and the rule never got changed but in this specific case, can you honestly say that extra cop would have saved you?

I mean, nobody, not even Jimbo, would want to be PK'd for good because an SD forgot to change a rule. :P

I mean, for all we know, it could be Jimbo who has to argue their legal case with this rule.

Like I said, if I had no case, I'd likely just be playing Fallout 4 right now.

i can't argue the legitimacy of that because it's not a fuckup on my part it's a fuckup on the staff's part, it's up to them who to fuck over now

Oh, I mean, the usefulness of the fifth cop would've been minimal. But really, it's the fact that it would've been possible to do the PK at all with less than five (but more than three as the rules confusingly put) that I am here with the argument n' crap.

Wash, nobody knows if he forgot to change the rule yet man. You're literally going on a guess. Unless you can show me a screenshot that Blackquill said he forgot then it means nothing.

Eh.

https://nebulous.cloud/threads/b-r-james-washingtons-ban-appeal.22733/#post-393319

Unless you don't trust Flippy.

ow my notifications

What I find odd about this is why would you need 5 cops to kill a citizen but three to shotcop? You could kill those four online cops in your case as a rebel without consequences but couldn't then kill the speaker you're aiming at?

I don't know, I'm definitely not for different amounts, in fact, I am more for a Citizen-to-CP Ratio, like, for every 10-20 citizens, in order to PK, you must have a CP per 10-20 citizens.

I mean, it needs work but that's just rambling ideas.

But if not, flat amounts most definitely, and for a cop itself to count itself as one, not like "I want five different cops on rather than four and myself"

I get what you're defending but it is not the fault of Jimbo and the rest at all - that's what the rules were at the time, that's what they saw and they correctly did their PK in regards to the rules. If people forgot to change them, it's not their fault and it'd be a mistake to unPK you because of everything they've risked and gone through. They did everything correctly in accordance with the rules at the time.