D
ubisoft are king cucks you know this is going to have political subtext about beating the evil white manif your game protagonist isn't a late 20's white guy with short brown hair and a grizzled appearance you are literally supporting white genocide
ubisoft are king cucks you know this is going to have political subtext about beating the evil white man
but the more people complain the more they sell, the anti-ubi shills make ubi more money
fuck this game
If this was a female tied up with two men leering over her with weapons it would be frowned uponubisoft are king cucks you know this is going to have political subtext about beating the evil white man
but the more people complain the more they sell, the anti-ubi shills make ubi more money
fuck this game
if it was a black man with two white men it would be hated uponIf this was a female tied up with two men leering over her with weapons it would be frowned upon
“Mah equality!”
i liked 5. i never felt it had the impression as killing the evil white religious man because you play as some cop and they’re cultistsI mean people had a big whine about how Far Cry 5 was all about murdering evil Christians and white men because haha sjws but it really wasn't about that at all lmao
still p shit writing but it wasn't what it was made out to be
i liked 5. i never felt it had the impression as killing the evil white religious man because you play as some cop and they’re cultists
the writing was edgy, like many far cry games, but im telling you this one will be terrible
Nah I just think it’s clear pandering from a company that in all fairness couldn’t give a fuck but is doing it to reel in the bucks. Just looks ingenuous and cringey.I just find it pretty stupid how people scramble over eachother to try and find something political about a game
if there's a female character it must be a feminist plot to destroy gaming
if there's a black character it must be historical revisionism
if there's a LGBT character it must be the gay agenda forcing it's way into things again
Nah I just think it’s clear pandering from a company that in all fairness couldn’t give a fuck but is doing it to reel in the bucks. Just looks ingenuous and cringey.
I mean I don't see why it's only an issue now that the protags are black and female, Far Cry as a series has always had either gookerinos or white dudes as their protags since day one, as long as it doesn't become a knuckle dragging pseudo-intellectual shitfest like the rest of 'em and the story can carry itself it's whatever.
I think they're meant to be the antagonists
No my point was that if this was two males leering over a female in the cover art people would go mental and would hunt for the heads of Ubisoft. The point I’m trying to make is that most of the people they’re pandering to (which is forced) are huge hypocritical sociopaths.I mean I don't see why it's only an issue now that the protags are black and female, Far Cry as a series has always had either gookerinos or white dudes as their protags since day one, as long as it doesn't become a knuckle dragging pseudo-intellectual shitfest like the rest of 'em and the story can carry itself it's whatever.
People keep getting so het up that we blacks and lightys want some representation and characters that we can associate and sympathise with on even an aesthetic level, shit like BFV I can understand cause that was literally editing history, but a character in a videogame series that has very little grounding in reality? Come on now man...
I mean that's not an issue either lol, just as long as there isn't a buff white dude hunting them down and lynching them and they actually get wasted in a firefight I still don't see the issue.
No my point was that if this was two males leering over a female in the cover art people would go mental and would hunt for the heads of Ubisoft. The point I’m trying to make is that most of the people they’re pandering to (which is forced) are huge hypocritical sociopaths.
[doublepost=1544169170][/doublepost]Plus the game doesn’t look any good. It’s just copying Rage at this point and might be a flop.
I don't think it's a problem either, honestly I couldn't give less of a shit about Far Cry at this point
I'm reminded of CoD WW2 (the campaign), which had a black dude who was part of a segregated company and then a french resistance woman and people still chimped out about MUH HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Rage was garbo and you know it don't even front.
This shit looks pretty good to me story-wise, bullshots aside in the trailer I like the overall environment more than FC5.
Rage was garbo and you know it don't even front.
This shit looks pretty good to me story-wise, bullshots aside in the trailer I like the overall environment more than FC5. Also I mean obviously if there was a shirtless woman on the cover and two dudes were learing over her with a crossbow problems would be raised simply from the general nature of the cover art itself lol, just as if the dude in said picture didn't have on any trousers I'm sure there'd be a crowd of aggravated people.
[doublepost=1544169385][/doublepost]
It's funny to see white dudes chimp the fuck out super hard and just have literally everyone else on Earth happy to play a game with a story that isn't literally this.
MICHAEL MCAUCASIAN WAS JUST AN ORDINARY GUY THEN AFTER SOMETHING BAD HAPPENED HE WAS CALLED TO ARMS TO PROCEED THROUGH A DANGEROUS ENVIRONMENT AND HAVE A HEROIC SACRIFICE.
Shit never needed to be so cut copy, I'm personally super glad games are fucking diversifying and attempting to write different characters.
Save the unreasonable genocide crusade for characters that can do it well, like Doomguy.
Farcry stopped being decent at 3, the rest for me personally were just shit and went back on the huge strides they had made in previous games.
If they actually took shit seriously and immersed the players like in Farcry 2 then I’d be interested, otherwise they can keep releasing these wacky half-baked shit cookies and I won’t buy them.