War Thunder

[Benjideaula]

It is, the Chieftan was developed in 1990

Abrams developed 1979.

The Chieftan has less armour, yes, but it's more effective armour.

It was also proven better in the Iraq war.

you wanna go at it a third time m8s we'll kick your tea drinking monocled bad teeth in

 

[Husky]

you wanna go at it a third time m8s we'll kick your tea drinking monocled bad teeth in

We only lost one Cheiftan in the Iraq war... Due to friendly fire in a night time battle.

 

[Roosebud]

People arguing over upcoming tanks in war thunder are always disappointed by gameplay balance nerfing and sekrit documents. Latest dev server digest already indicated that the ERA-packages are easily circumvented with a .50, the American MBT-70, German Kpfz-70 and British Chieftain mk.10 suffer from nerfing in the earliest stages as otherwise the armor would be neigh-invulnerable. Best out of the line currently seems to be the T-62A as expected.

That doesn't mean I wont grind the MBT-70 for the 20mil cannon on the roof alone tho

 

[Husky]

Chieftain mk.10 suffer from nerfing in the earliest stages as otherwise the armor would be neigh-invulnerable. Best out of the line currently seems to be the T-62A as expected.

Chieftan Mk10 + Small map generated artillary hole/Cover from head glitching = Indestructible.

 

[Benjideaula]

We only lost one Cheiftan in the Iraq war... Due to friendly fire in a night time battle.

well your tanks aren't the first chieftains we've massacred, your "advanced armor" would do jack squat against our God-given A-10 Warthogs

 

[Ond]

well your tanks aren't the first chieftains we've massacred, your "advanced armor" would do jack squat against our God-given A-10 Warthogs

are there a10s in war thunder

no, there arent

 

[Deleted member 1381]

is it an actual game I just saw it was one of those adverts on fb that looks too good to be real so I just ignored it

 

[Husky]

well your tanks aren't the first chieftains we've massacred, your "advanced armor" would do jack squat against our God-given A-10 Warthogs

You mean the A-10 that caused many many many friendly fire casualties due to it's shit target identification?

 

[Benjideaula]

You mean the A-10 that caused many many many friendly fire casualties due to it's shit target identification?

you mean this?

 

[Husky]

you mean this?

Yeah, we also informed them that we were switching our vehicle colours to orange, so they would know not to attack vehicles with orange on them.

There's footage of the A-10 pilots saying "They have orange sheets, aren't they British" "Nah, because they used blue don't they?" "Yeah, you're probably right" *Proceeds to kill 4 British soldiers in and around a UAZ.*

also this.

I saw the casualty list, about 1/4 of the casualties were FF, most by Americans, one death to British FF which was the one that hit the Cheiftan at night.

 

[Ond]

is it an actual game? I just saw it was one of those adverts on fb that looks too good to be real so I just ignored it

It does look very nice, yes

 

[Benjideaula]

Yeah, we also informed them that we were switching our vehicle colours to orange, so they would know not to attack vehicles with orange on them.

There's footage of the A-10 pilots saying "They have orange sheets, aren't they British" "Nah, because they used blue don't they?" "Yeah, you're probably right" *Proceeds to kill 4 British soldiers in and around a UAZ.*

also this.

I saw the casualty list, about 1/4 of the casualties were FF, most by Americans, one death to British FF which was the one that hit the Cheiftan at night.

Y'know what they say, lack of communication sKills

 

[Husky]

Y'know what they say, lack of communication sKills

Spoiler: FF

Please tell Americans to stop shooting their own men, would be helpful.

This is a random page from the casualty list as well, not even knit picked.

 

[Benjideaula]

Spoiler: FF

Please tell Americans to stop shooting their own men, would be helpful.

This is a random page from the casualty list as well, not even knit picked.

from the list of men on this chart, how many casualties were deaths? Because deaths and injuries are both considered casualties as both take a man out of the fight.

 

[Husky]

from the list of men on this chart, how many casualties were deaths? Because deaths and injuries are both considered casualties as both take a man out of the fight.

all of them

 

[Ond]

both countries kill their own troops

/argument

 

[Benjideaula]

all of them

oh.... that's bad
[doublepost=1505151646][/doublepost]

both countries kill their own troops

/argument

and what are you doing other than inventing delicious baked goods.

 

[Ond]

and what are you doing other than inventing delicious baked goods.

FN = UN
NATO = Self explanatory
Koalitioner = Coalitions
Nationale opgaver = Operations based in national interest

Map of locations in which troops are currently stationed

 

[Benjideaula]

FN = UN
NATO = Self explanatory
Koalitioner = Coalitions
Nationale opgaver = Operations based in national interest

Map of locations in which troops are currently stationed

so you're just partaking in some seal clubbing?

 

[Ond]

so you're just partaking in some seal clubbing?

are u blind