That's down to the people and situation imoAlso for some reason the wasteland doesn't seem to be improving in the sense of government. In Fallout 2 you see paved roads, clean homes, and all that stuff.
Alright I'm going to say this as a general statement regarding fallout. The Bethesda Fallout games blow as Fallout games. Playing through the first two I came to realize that the Bethesda Fallout games don't have a certain charm to them. Also for some reason the wasteland doesn't seem to be improving in the sense of government. In Fallout 2 you see paved roads, clean homes, and all that stuff.
The institute is the only thing that actually showed further progress, but they were seen as evil.maybe it's because in fallout 2 they didn't have the nessecary equipment to make it look as post apocalyptic as they'd like.
As for progressing - diamond city? Rivet city? The Institute? They're pretty well off for a world that'll kill you ever corner you turn
The institute is the only thing that actually showed further progress, but they were seen as evil.
Also another thing Bethesda doesn't know nuisance. Enclave were bad in Fallout 3 and the Institute were bad in Fallout 4 even though they were probably the best option for the Wasteland.
Saying that they didn't have the necessary equipment to make it look as post apocalyptic doesn't really apply because the rest of Fallout 1 and 2 felt like that. You can see the massive different between the Hub, and the Boneyard compared to NCR town, and Broken hills.
B I G I R O Ni hope they have customized radio stations
so i can blast out some tuneage