- Joined
- Apr 27, 2016
- Messages
- 4,492
- Nebulae
- 3,332
wh
this is the uk thread
not the american thread
we cant answer that
he's ur royal
living in our country
if they stay, their latest baby gonna come out an american citizen too.
take them back.
wh
this is the uk thread
not the american thread
we cant answer that
you mean the royal that is no longer a royal?he's ur royal
living in our country
if they stay, their latest baby gonna come out an american citizen too.
take them back.
If it dips like 5% more I start losingneed a couch to crash on?
you mean the royal that is no longer a royal?
if you mean who I think you mean, he left the royal family.
no he just ditched his duties
keeps his titles and all that.
he still a royal without the yob still all in the family!!!
he's urs.
take him back.
He’s lost his title and privileges
also his wife is american
he literally kept them they're opting to not use them, but allowed to keep them
hell his AMERICAN wife even gets to keep her duchess title
they need to take their prince back
[doublepost=1614285647][/doublepost]why are the british exporting their prince to america???
what is the british hiding???
i demand answers from you lot.
and the queen.
surely nuking somewhere in such close proximity wouldnt be worth it versus the possible permanent effects, even in a worse case scenarioOh boy! More nuclear weapon contingencies to think about this afternoon.
If things were to ever fragment to the point that the Acts of Union are dissolved and all the major nations of the British Isles emerged as totally independent states, it's a pretty high probability that the English would be the inheritors of the UK's nuclear deterrent. Given the SNP's policy on nuclear weapons in Scotland, the Royal Navy would phase out Clyde and Coulport and move southward.
The most likely outcome would be for England to establish an umbrella policy for the newly independent states of the British Isles, very similar to the measures put in place by the United States with respect to Germany, Japan, and South Korea. However that's by no means a foregone conclusion and, even if it was, putting the defense and diplomatic framework into place could take at least a decade. A lot can happen over that period of time and, depending on local animosities bleeding into the political sphere, there's a potential for some off-the-wall scenarios.
If things devolved to a point that even the 1560 Treaty of Edinburgh was untenable, then there's a very non-zero chance that Scotland might request French support as a strategic nuclear counterbalance in a modern version of the Auld Alliance.
And the nuclear deterrence community thought India vs. Pakistan would be the flashpoint for the next nuclear conflict.
I’m telling you he’s lost his privileges the royal family refuses to communicate with him lol
we're due another dresdensurely nuking somewhere in such close proximity wouldnt be worth it versus the possible permanent effects, even in a worse case scenario
cant wait
movign out of this country as soon as i can land a decent job and rack up the money
we're due another dresden
with edinburgh the new target
if the english nuke us, swarms of mutated glaswegians will march to london and put heads on pikes
meanwhile, little difference will be noticeable, given how much of a shithole post-industrial scotland looks like
legendary glowing smackheadif the english nuke us, swarms of mutated glaswegians will march to london and put heads on pikes
meanwhile, little difference will be noticeable, given how much of a shithole post-industrial scotland looks like