#MoreThanARefugee like/dislike counter

[JohnLugo]

What Syrian Refugee's have done since being let in to different countries(STARTING FROM 2012)

Incidents from countries that took in Syrian refugee's: France, Britain, Denmark, Israel, USA

How many terrorist attacks have happened since 2012?
USA: 6
France: 14
Britain: 8
Denmark: 3
Israel: 4

How many thwarted terrorists attacks since 2012 (When the refugee crisis started)
USA: 3
France: 11
Britain: 4
Denmark: 4
Israel: 5

What countries have had massive refugee riots that destroyed government property, and private property?
Greece
Sweden
Germany
Denmark
Jordan

How many people have died in these attacks?
USA: 221
France: 248
Britain: 43
Denmark: 69
Israel: 9

Total number of fatalities: 590



This is just a small percentage of countries that have been attacked.. and a massive example of WHY we shouldn't let in any refugee's in to a civilized, and modern civilization, as some people have stated above if they want freedom so bad then they need to fight for it. All the do is weaken the economy for each of these countries; they need to eat, sleep, drink, basically all that stuff, trust me.. if they wanted freedom and rights so bad they would have already taken over their corrupted, uncivilized, terrorist hotbed of a country.

what are you talking about goy we haven't taken any refugees

 

[Ond]

How many thwarted terrorists attacks since 2012 (When the refugee crisis started)
Denmark: 4

What countries have had massive refugee riots that destroyed government property, and private property?
Denmark

How many people have died in these attacks?
Denmark: 69

 

[The Dinosir]

All over the world, except in the Americas it seems. See a pattern?

Yes I am late, fuck off.

Considering Bush's US and Blair's UK started the whole shitshow in the first place, don't you think that both countries should offer asylum to refugees as an apology for ruining their homes?

 

[JohnLugo]

Yes I am late, fuck off.

Considering Bush's US and Blair's UK started the whole shitshow in the first place, don't you think that both countries should offer asylum to refugees as an apology for ruining their homes?

"ruining their homes" you can thank mr. sarin gas saddam hussein and mr. i got asylum in afghanistan bin laden. the west was completely jusitified in retaliating to the attacks that came from the same countries

 

[The Dinosir]

"ruining their homes" you can thank mr. sarin gas saddam hussein and mr. i got asylum in afghanistan bin laden. the west was completely jusitified in retaliating to the attacks that came from the same countries

Not really. USA gets rid of a dictator, and fails to put in a stable government ---------> Insurgencies grow without a government/police force/army to stop them, terrorist groups grow.

If you can't fix a country after invading it for no reason, then you have no business invading it.

 

[All Adm*ns are Bastards]

Give the refugees a gun and send them back to their country, tell them to fight for their own freedom.

i dunno every time you guys give middle eastern nations guns it never really works out in the end

 

[JohnLugo]

Not really. USA gets rid of a dictator, and fails to put in a stable government ---------> Insurgencies grow without a government/police force/army to stop them, terrorist groups grow.

If you can't fix a country after invading it for no reason, then you have no business invading it.

do you even know how much of a threat saddam was to regional peace. had he was allowed to continue on his business you would've seen him today fighting the entire region with the same ideological drive that drives ISIS and that is middle eastern unification, only difference that he wanted to do it over race than religion. i'd take terrorists who run a failed state than the dictator who produced chemical weapons and tried to get a nuclear bomb.

the united states did put in a government that was stable for the time being but was also corrupt. that is exactly what happens when you just decide to run back home with your troops instead of staying and pacifying all remaining terrorist factions. obama ran out of iraq and expected the local fresh government to deal with the terrorists that the americans have dealt with for a decade. al-qaeda grew under saddam for years so i don't get your point.
[doublepost=1498052480][/doublepost]

i dunno every time you guys give middle eastern nations guns it never really works out in the end

works here just fine

 

[ruben slikk]

What countries have had massive refugee riots that destroyed government property, and private property?
Greece

Not going to comment on the rest because I don't really care but are you fucking retarded? The riots in greece were refugee riots? yeah nice one retarded bitch

There's so many examples I don't see why you have to attribute riots in a country to refugees when it was not due to refugees

You are so fucking stupid holy shit I think this is the first time I actually insult someone on the forum since my unban

 

[welcome to the Retirement]

a gross oversimplification of an incredibly complex issue, surely you can't claim to speak for all the millions of internally and externally displaced people fleeing all conflicts across the world?

you can't claim to speak for all the millions of internally and externally displaced people fleeing all conflicts across the world?

millions of internally and externally displaced people fleeing all conflicts across the world?

The entire refugee situation is a load of bull.

In 1776 a handful of colonists relying on nothing but their skill with the musket began a revolution against the most powerful empire in the world. They had some help from France and Spain, but mainly it was the American colonists fighting the British head on.

And you know what? They won.

They didn't flee to other countries, or moan and cry, they fought back and won their freedom.

They brought democracy, albiet flawed in the beginning, they made it through those first few years and eventually became a world super power.

In Syria, the rebels have wide international support. We've given them guns, medical supplies, hell even AIR support yet they keep loosing troops due to their people not being that interested in democracy.

ah yes lol those fags at warzones just fight back ahahahahha problem solved

 

[Deleted member 19]

ah yes lol those fags at warzones just fight back ahahahahha problem solved

Hey, if America could do it, ANYONE can do it.

 

[Deleted member 374]

Hey, if America could do it, ANYONE can do it.

okay first of all, there's a major difference between syria and the american revolution

american revolution: cannons, muskets, swords, etc

syria: chemical bombs, planes, sniper rifles, mortars, and various other methods of long-range bombing


you can't just say "durr america did it xD" because the climates and technology have changed dramatically. not to mention the fact that the colonists weren't subject to the same conditions a lot of internally and externally displaced people are today.

 

[Deleted member 19]

okay first of all, there's a major difference between syria and the american revolution

american revolution: cannons, muskets, swords, etc

syria: chemical bombs, planes, sniper rifles, mortars, and various other methods of long-range bombing


you can't just say "durr america did it xD" because the climates and technology have changed dramatically. not to mention the fact that the colonists weren't subject to the same conditions a lot of internally and externally displaced people are today.

Yeah, they did just have primitive firearms, but they were also outnumbered by a vast and highly trained fighting force, the greatest in the world. Yet they managed to pull it off and win.

In Syria there are a shitload more weapon types, but the Free Syrian Army doesn't lack any of that. They have international support, and the U.S. giving them supplies. If they truly believed in democracy their troops wouldn't defect to ISIS and they'd of pushed Assad's forces into the sea and won.

 

[Deleted member 374]

Yeah, they did just have primitive firearms, but they were also outnumbered by a vast and highly trained fighting force, the greatest in the world. Yet they managed to pull it off and win.

In Syria there are a shitload more weapon types, but the Free Syrian Army doesn't lack any of that. They have international support, and the U.S. giving them supplies. If they truly believed in democracy their troops wouldn't defect to ISIS and they'd of pushed Assad's forces into the sea and won.

what i thought we were talking about displaced persons

 

[Powley]

No, it's not morally good to let them in.

Your fucking over freedom loving, peaceful, good people for those who want to come in and leech off you.

Europe used to rule the world, it still does in some ways, but all of that is going to go down the drain unless Europe stands up for itself.

Give the refugees a gun and send them back to their country, tell them to fight for their own freedom.

Your some sort of fucking idiot the way you're carying on fella.

"Give them a gun and tell them to fight for their own freedom" Auch aye am sure wee Mohammad, aged eight is gonna fucking carry a akm into fucking battle against some radical extremists.

I find it fucking ironic you're willing to send these people to their deaths because they "might" tread on your toes but more then likely you'd hide under a fucking desk if someone came knocking around your neighbourhood with a gun.

Seriously, shut yer hole.

 

[Deleted member 19]

Your some sort of fucking idiot the way you're carying on fella.

"Give them a gun and tell them to fight for their own freedom" Auch aye am sure wee Mohammad, aged eight is gonna fucking carry a akm into fucking battle against some radical extremists.

I find it fucking ironic you're willing to send these people to their deaths because they "might" tread on your toes but more then likely you'd hide under a fucking desk if someone came knocking around your neighbourhood with a gun.

Seriously, shut yer hole.

Stop taking what I say and exaggerating the hell out of it.

No one in there right mind is going to give a kid a fucking gun and tell him to do that.

The final thing that you said...they 'might' tread on our shoes? Are you fucking blind? Do you not see what is going on in Europe because of the refugees?

 

[JohnLugo]

Yeah, they did just have primitive firearms, but they were also outnumbered by a vast and highly trained fighting force, the greatest in the world. Yet they managed to pull it off and win.

In Syria there are a shitload more weapon types, but the Free Syrian Army doesn't lack any of that. They have international support, and the U.S. giving them supplies. If they truly believed in democracy their troops wouldn't defect to ISIS and they'd of pushed Assad's forces into the sea and won.

the united states only helps them out against isis and on very rare exceptions against assad. the americans aren't sending entires armies to actually fight alongside them. the very opposite thing actually happens with the syrian army where it has the support of hezbollah, the russian army, and the iranian revolutionary guard alongside plenty of shia militias and occasionally the kurds. try winning a war when there are so many forces that are against you and your only ally can't really help you as much as your own enemy's allies help him.

 

[Deleted member 19]

what i thought we were talking about displaced persons

They wouldn't be displaced if they put their families in the Free Syrian Army's control zone and then went out to fight ISIS and Assad.

 

[welcome to the Retirement]

Hey, if America could do it, ANYONE can do it.

JFC do you not understand sarcasm or are you simply dumb?
In case you ain't aware - I'm one of the "shithead refugees". A potential one, at least.
I live in an active warzone, and plan to seek refuge in Canada as soon as I turn eighteen.

Say hi to a fucking parasite, will ya?

 

[Deleted member 243]

Hey, if America could do it, ANYONE can do it.

Due to technological advancements, I highly doubt that taking up arms would solve anything.

Think about this: it's the 21st century. Guns can literally tear you the fuck up. The musket times are over, and giving an M16 to an untrained militant might not work out like back in the day.

And of course the rebels are being fucked left and right. ISIS vastly outnumbers outposts and bumrushes like a bunch of Commie soldiers. They overwhelm the outposts and roflstomp anyone in their way. And not to forget, the guerrila tactics they use.

HEY, IF AMERICA IS SO STRONK, WHY COULDN'T THEY BEAT VIETNAM???

 

[Stalker]

Hey guys Stalker here with another great idea lets gather a bunch of un-trained civilians, give them out-dated equipment and tell them to attack a foe that wears no uniform, has superior technology, has numbers and has literally no moral code and will cut your head off to show a point.

what could possibly go wrong??? viva le revolution!!!