Goatson
Guardian
- Joined
- May 15, 2016
- Messages
- 7,258
- Nebulae
- 5,350
It's against the nature of the ideology, and they aren't self-proclaimed liberals eitherway.then if these liberals want to be liberals then they are liberals by your logic.
Liberalism and lack of freedom of speech don't co-exist.
Anarcho-communism, communism, and similar, can co-exist with a lack of free speech, and actively demand it in terms of their political opponents.
I know I'm not gonna change your mind about it, but basically what I was trying to say from the get-go can be summed up as
"It's wrong to call them liberal, because they aren't liberal."
I was just using the far left as the most suitable example of what it could be called, could be called fascism too though since they believe the same thing in that regard.
Don't get your knickers in a twist just because I decided to call them by what they want to be known as, even though YOU might not want to associate with em.