Premium Update - August 2019

Status
Not open for further replies.

Wonderland

Proton
Joined
Apr 1, 2018
Messages
305
Nebulae
753
I do not want to sound rude regarding to the effort the Staff team puts into this community. I am incredibly thankful and I love this server, but when something is wrong, I just say it...

Bird whitelist, a wonderful thought! When we include a whitelist that is linked to RolePlay, we cannot take from it ALL the IC commands. I consider that this is a significant error that drives people to be determined minges while "RPING" as a bird, because they plainly got the capability taken by whoever elected to make this a thing.

Let's make things right, want to add a bird whitelist? Sounds marvelous, provide them with the tools to RP accordingly instead of influencing them into flying around like hysterical individuals and standing on people’s skull.

@Blackquill @Jaydawg
 

Sil

jus one more fing
Joined
Aug 28, 2016
Messages
6,399
Nebulae
8,139
I do not want to sound rude regarding to the effort the Staff team puts into this community. I am incredibly thankful and I love this server, but when something is wrong, I just say it...

Bird whitelist, a wonderful thought! When we include a whitelist that is linked to RolePlay, we cannot take from it ALL the IC commands. I consider that this is a significant error that drives people to be determined minges while "RPING" as a bird, because they plainly got the capability taken by whoever elected to make this a thing.

Let's make things right, want to add a bird whitelist? Sounds marvelous, provide them with the tools to RP accordingly instead of influencing them into flying around like hysterical individuals and standing on people’s skull.

@Blackquill @Jaydawg

@Aether is currently in the process of making up a proper document on Birds, roleplay and rule-wise.

Hopefully it get implemented.
 
Reactions: List

Aether

Molecule
GTA RP Playtester
Joined
Apr 26, 2016
Messages
5,714
Nebulae
4,483
@Aether is currently in the process of making up a proper document on Birds, roleplay and rule-wise.

Hopefully it get implemented.
I'm just doing it because someone should, but if you're gonna keep tagging me at least give them the link so they can see it for themselves, or quote my original post:
Okay y'know what, I was gonna make my own thread but fuck it, this one will do.

I spent eight hours last night working on this and I want some peoples opinions, first I want the opinions of the people that might be able to actually use the faction, then I'll take it to the SA's personally, so, here.

I've written a megathread doc for the Bird faction that makes them a real faction with real rules that should keep them in line.

Moreover, I've also created a system that will make tamed birds actually useful and a commodity for the right people, making them a great supplementary faction for rebels and loyalists alike.

Please give me feedback and suggestions for improvement if there's anything here that you think could be better, I'd like to know before I take it anywhere else. Thanks!

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wV-Pm5KFOn82TAQ4Q1HpBGb6Nu9B9yEU2XXJuD52F0Y/edit?usp=sharing

It's also worth noting that it all has no weight right now and is purely theoretical. I plan to formally suggest it after a week of the doc being active for people to give feedback on, but until then and for who knows how long after, I have zero weight in the matter - i'm just someone that wrote a doc.
 

Wonderland

Proton
Joined
Apr 1, 2018
Messages
305
Nebulae
753
I'm just doing it because someone should, but if you're gonna keep tagging me at least give them the link so they can see it for themselves, or quote my original post:


It's also worth noting that it all has no weight right now and is purely theoretical. I plan to formally suggest it after a week of the doc being active for people to give feedback on, but until then and for who knows how long after, I have zero weight in the matter - i'm just someone that wrote a doc.
Great document, would love to see that implemented.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.