Serious Went to a Jordan Peterson talk

[Husky]

I couldn’t care less about homophobes, real ones can go fuck themselves. Besides it is definetly being used as an argument for gay parenting to convince people who are against it. Quite literally the Christian Democrats changed their policy to support it here using that exact argument and noone in the party, even the most conservative ones, batted an eye.

Thinking radicalisation can't happen with justification from Jordan Peterson's video's. Homophobes don't just exist, they're radicalised into that way of thinking, and Peterson having a doctorate could give some credibility to his heavily flawed arguments, you're even buying into it yourself despite there being no evidence to support it.

 

[Goatson]

Thinking radicalisation can't happen with justification from Jordan Peterson's video's. Homophobes don't just exist, they're radicalised into that way of thinking, and Peterson having a doctorate could give some credibility to his heavily flawed arguments, you're even buying into it yourself despite there being no evidence to support it.

Do you have any non-anecdotal evidence to support that it ISNT true?

 

[Husky]

Do you have any non-anecdotal evidence to support that it ISNT true?

The burden of proof isn't on me.

 

[Blackquill]

The burden of proof isn't on me.

 

[Ond]

The burden of proof isn't on me.

the burden of proof is on the person delivering the argument

 

[Husky]

the burden of proof is on the person delivering the argument

He delivered the argument that gay people are not as effeciant at raising children as heterosexual couples, he didn't provide any evidence to back this up besides irrelivant and flawed studies.

 

[Goatson]

The burden of proof isn't on me.

You’re the one arguing what a certified psychologist says isn’t true you dunce

 

[Blackquill]

certified psychologist

Tbh regardless of what you think of his ideas

The fact he dedicated his occupation to a job that specialises in helping people is pretty commendable if you ask me

 

[Husky]

You’re the one arguing what a certified psychologist says isn’t true you dunce

He made the claim, not me.
[doublepost=1542637899][/doublepost]

Tbh regardless of what you think of his ideas

The fact he dedicated his occupation to a job that specialises in helping people is pretty commendable if you ask me

He isn't helping people though, he's borderline forming a cult and giving people scurvy from his meat only diet.

 

[Goatson]

He delivered the argument that gay people are not as effeciant at raising children as heterosexual couples, he didn't provide any evidence to back this up besides irrelivant and flawed studies.

He made the claim, not me.
[doublepost=1542637899][/doublepost]
He isn't helping people though, he's borderline forming a cult and giving people scurvy from his meat only diet.

shouldn’t being professionally educated and working with psychology be backing enough when discussing something intrinsicly tied to psychology?

I’d trust him more than you any day of the week

 

[Angel]

So let me get this straight

Jordan Peterson is a nazi enabler because

• he says Venezuela is bad
• he doesn't like marxism
• he doesn't like communist
• he doesn't think either are functioning theories
• he says Nazis are evil, but he needs to say they're more evil than evil because evil is not evil enough for someone to not be enabled to think being evil but not too evil is actually not evil

Jordan Peterson is a brainlet because

• He has theories, some of which are based on already formulated theories
• He is a failed psychologist
• He is dumber than @Husky and Husky admits to being pretty dumb

Jordan Peterson is homophobic because

• He questions, from a scientific (and not moral) standpoint as to the effectiveness of a same sex couple as opposed to the traditional couple and their ability to comprehensively raise a child with every expected nuance
• He thinks same sex couples can do it, but will need more work
• He enables homophobes because he has a doctorate and because he has a doctorate, the arguments he constructs are obviously flawed, in the field he has the doctorate for, because I don't have a doctorate and no they're flawed but the skinhead is transcending everyone and can see the OBVIOUS flaws in the argument but still use the argument because he was radicalised by the argument, which would kinda imply he had no reason to want to shut out the flaws of the argument, but fuck Jordan Peterson btw

The great nebulous debate

Angel vs Husky
Moderator Evil
Generic gay guy in the crowd for diversity Goatson

Lets make it happen! Well, we can't, because Husky still thinks anyone believes he is a woman and thus refuses to use the mic, despite having previously activated the mic by accident and a few of us hearing him already xDDDD
Pretty sure it got recorded as well, might get my hands on that

 

[Blackquill]

He isn't helping people though

He's helped more people than you ever have lol, helped turn many people's lives around or give them a different perspective on life. Just because you don't like him or his ideas, doesn't change the good he's done

he's borderline forming a cult

Having a following of people who respect your ideas and care what you say is a cult, is it? Blackquill hate cult throwback

giving people scurvy from his meat only diet.

Haha how does scurvy even exist, like drink some orange juice man

 

[Husky]

Jordan Peterson is a nazi enabler because

• he says Venezuela is bad
• he doesn't like marxism
• he doesn't like communist
• he doesn't think either are functioning theories
• he says Nazis are evil, but he needs to say they're more evil than evil because evil is not evil enough for someone to not be enabled to think being evil but not too evil is actually not evil

No.

Jordan Peterson is a brainlet because

• He has theories, some of which are based on already formulated theories
• He is a failed psychologist
• He is dumber than @Husky and Husky admits to being pretty dumb

He's dumb because he doesn't make any original points and makes very bad takes and is easily debunkable.

Jordan Peterson is homophobic because

• He questions, from a scientific (and not moral) standpoint as to the effectiveness of a same sex couple as opposed to the traditional couple and their ability to comprehensively raise a child with every expected nuance
• He thinks same sex couples can do it, but will need more work
• He enables homophobes because he has a doctorate and because he has a doctorate, the arguments he constructs are obviously flawed, in the field he has the doctorate for, because I don't have a doctorate and no they're flawed but the skinhead is transcending everyone and can see the OBVIOUS flaws in the argument but still use the argument because he was radicalised by the argument, which would kinda imply he had no reason to want to shut out the flaws of the argument, but fuck Jordan Peterson btw

He's homophobic because he gives flawed studies and reasoning to back up points that can easily be used to justify against gay marriage.

 

[Goatson]

Generic gay guy in the crowd for diversity Goatson

Cant tell if this is an insult or a compliment but I’ll take it :)

 

[Angel]

Haha how does scurvy even exist, like drink some orange juice man

He's referring to his Beef only diet, that he and his daughter do.
His daughter had immense health problems and it was supposedly associated with her diet, so she started removing stuff from her diet, eventually resulting in meat only and her health problems have gone away.
Jordan Peterson then proceeded to say he wanted to try it for a month and felt better, however he has 0 knowledge of nutrition and it is purely based on the effects he is feeling on himself and the effects he saw in his daughter and he recommends it to no one.

 

[Goatson]

He's homophobic because he gives flawed studies and reasoning to back up points that can easily be used to justify against gay marriage.

The same points have been used to justify being for gay marriage though so...

 

[Husky]

shouldn’t being professionally educated and working with psychology be backing enough when discussing something intrinsicly tied to psychology?

No, scientists need evidence to back up their theories and claims too.

He's helped more people than you ever have lol, helped turn many people's lives around or give them a different perspective on life. Just because you don't like him or his ideas, doesn't change the good he's done


Having a following of people who respect your ideas and care what you say is a cult, is it? Blackquill hate cult throwback


Haha how does scurvy even exist, like drink some orange juice man

this is just a bandwagon fallacy and ignoring his actual views, he doesn't people should take anything but meat and water, literally nothing.

 

[Angel]

The same points have been used to justify being for gay marriage though so...

David Cameron said, he is FOR gay marriage BECAUSE he is a conservative

 

[Husky]

He's referring to his Beef only diet, that he and his daughter do.
His daughter had immense health problems and it was supposedly associated with her diet, so she started removing stuff from her diet, eventually resulting in meat only and her health problems have gone away.
Jordan Peterson then proceeded to say he wanted to try it for a month and felt better, however he has 0 knowledge of nutrition and it is purely based on the effects he is feeling on himself and the effects he saw in his daughter and he recommends it to no one.

I am calling bullshit on Petersons claim as they make no sense at all.
[doublepost=1542638330][/doublepost]

The same points have been used to justify being for gay marriage though so...

how?

 

[Deerjohn]

hi I'm here for the diversity quota
based Jordan Peterson