Yes, because clearly I was the one who brought it up and not simman when he wanted to bitch about how @Numbers is running things.
SMH man, this is the first time this has come up since Apoc and you're railing on me for defending myself against simman's inanity.
You put it on the forums before, accusing "an RL" of doing this stuff, on a suggestion where
nobody told you anything or provoked you in any way. We're not even on about this, Simman and Numbers can talk their own stuff and sort their problems, I'm pretty sure of it.
What, do the reporting myself?
I'm not affected, I do know who was, but it's not my position to demand they perform that. Ball's in their court, not mine.
If you're not affected why did you bring it up to throw shade at someone, if you don't even know the details. You dare judge someone when you're pulling this kind of antihero stuff. If it's not your position and you won't report it, keep the snarky remarks and second hand accusations to yourself.
I think the honest truth is that Simman has spent literally years cultivating - sometimes happily - the reputation he has. I'm sure he'll admit that himself, because he has before.
So when he comes into the feedback thread the way he has in the past - making jabs and claiming rebel bias - It reads the same way it has for years and years; like he's biased and with an agenda, complaining when things don't go the way of the faction he mains.
I'm not saying he deserves to be dogpiled at all but people aren't just going to forget what he's known for when he comes in kicking up dust.
Gives nobody the right to pull the shit 77East was pulling in a god damned suggestion. Or the mentions and backhanded comments indirectly dropped here and there but not just him but many others. There was no provocation in those cases, yet it was done. It makes me think.
you know this because you overheard part of it.
The only reason I know about the supposed harassment is cause
you brought it up in some unrelated thread because you felt like taking a random jab at him.
