>be one of the first American officers to embrace armoured warfare during WW1
>perfect the early armoured warfare doctrine
>lead the US army through early victories in North Africa
>be instrumental in the Italian campaigns
>be instrumental in the D-Day landings and the march to the rhine
but oh no some autistc british 15 year old says he fucked up one battle guess he's awful
BAHAHAHA
AMERICANS EMBRACING TANKS DURING WW1.
Yeah it's not like Tanks were introduced by the Brits first and then the Americans joined in the last year of the war.
Haig recognised where tanks were and were not useful (see
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Passchendaele)
Montgomery got Winston drunk and convinced him to use armoured regiments in Africa, not the Americans, and Monty turned round the African campaign.
Brits mainly did subterfuge work on the Italian peninsula so can't really argue that, although we did get pretty much most of the German tank divisions in Italy at the time due to the operation: The man who never was.
D-Day landings. Winston, Patton, Eisenhower and Montgomery were all planning the attack. Patton's plan was taken opposed to Montgomery's dagger attack which would have shortened the war by a year according to proffesionals but would have cost much mroe civilian and military casualties. The only reason Patton got it was because Monty wanted to invade during the storm and he threatened to resign unless they attacked during the eye of the storm, which Patton was forced to agree to as he wanted to keep Monty, as did Churchill.
Once D-Day was over Patton did basically fuck all.
And I think we've de-railed this enough.